J. Wesley Boyd, MD, PhD

Delighted to co-author this piece with Hana Abbasian and Avani Nooka, 2 recent graduates of the Master’s in Bioethics program at Harvard Medical School. It’s an important piece that advocates pumping the ethical brakes on yet another new tech development that many might endorse whole hog without too much thought, because it’s new, techie, and therefore “sexy.” Super proud of the piece and so delighted to have amazing co-authors!

Many health care organizations send patients a digital PHQ-9 depression questionnaire in the days leading up to an appointment. However, some organizations deliberately remove the final question of the PHQ-9, which asks about suicide.

When they omit the last question, organizations are doing so out of fear of legal liability.

In this piece Kyle Fitzpatrick, Geoff Engel, and I contend that omitting the question about suicide is unethical, unsupported by evidence, and rooted in stigma.

It is crucial that organizations ask the most important question in behavioral health care. Everyone deserves as much.

You can read the piece here:

I’m grateful to Kyle for reaching out several months back to discuss this important topic.

**Kyle and Geoff are both former students of mine–I’ve been beyond fortunate to have had so many amazing students and trainees over the years.

Covered our recent paper in the American Journal of Bioethics — Empirical. The podcast is here. Super proud of our work and that 4 of my co-authors on this important paper are former students of mine.

It’s critical of our findings–but not our methodology–and I’m fully supportive of vigorous debate. What an honor! https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/bioethics-is-becoming-just-another-social-justice-political-movement

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/feb/28/texas-pediatrician-support-healthcare

Super proud that Rachel Conrad, colleagues and I just published this piece in the APA journal Psychiatric Services. You can find it here: https://psychiatryonline.org/doi/10.1176/appi.ps.20240225

The APA just issued this “Psychiatric News Alert” about our piece:

Many psychiatrists in states with regulations permitting them to treat patients who regularly move across state lines (such as college students) are unaware they can do so, according to a study in Psychiatric Services. The findings also revealed that once informed of state exemptions, psychiatrists are split on their willingness to treat patients outside their state.

Rachel Conrad, M.D., of Brattleboro Retreat in Brattleboro, Vermont, and colleagues contacted 901 psychiatrists during the summer of 2023. All these psychiatrists advertised their services on an online platform and practiced in a state that had a medical licensure exemption or telehealth registry that would allow them to care for a patient who moved out-of-state. The investigators simulated an inquiry from a student who attends college in another state but wants to initiate treatment for new-onset depression while staying with their parents in the psychiatrist’s home state during the summer.

After extensive phone and email attempts, the researchers established contact with 143 psychiatrists who were accepting new patients. Of these, just seven (5%) were aware of their state’s medical licensure and/or telehealth exemptions. In these instances, the “student” offered an overview of the relevant laws that would allow for continuity of care once they returned to campus.

Among the 136 psychiatrists initially unaware of state laws:

• Forty-three (30%) were willing to establish care with students attending college in another state regardless of state laws, while 51 (36%) were unwilling to do so even when permitted by law.
• The remaining 42 (29%) wanted to learn more about licensure exemptions, though nine of this group subsequently declined to provide care to the student.

Conrad and colleagues noted that most of the psychiatrists they attempted to reach were in private practice and may not represent the field as a whole.

Still, the high rates of noncommunication, lack of state legal knowledge, and unwillingness to rely on medical licensure exemptions highlight the many barriers facing college students seeking mental health care, the researchers continued. Citing a federal law passed in 2018 that allows clinicians traveling with a sports team to practice in any other state, they suggested further federal licensure exemptions may be more effective at improving access to care.

For related information, see the Psychiatric Services study “Availability of Outpatient Child Psychiatric Care During COVID-19: A Simulated-Patient Study in Three U.S. Cities.”